NASSCOM Industry Report says, the money earned by Indian animation and VFX studios from global projects has steadily increased over the past decade.
Near the end of 2013, the animated movie Mahabharat was released and was touted as "India's most expensive multi-starrer animation film." The voice actors included the who's who of contemporary Indian cinema. Amitabh Bachchan lent his voice to the iconic character of Bhishma; Ajay Devgan was Arjun; Sunny Deol was Bheem and Vidya Balan was Draupadi. None of the actors charged any fee and yet, the movie had a budget of Rs 50 crore. After the first week, it managed to earn just Rs 1.5 crore.
Mahabharat was a phenomenal flop.
But much of it had to do with the low quality animation that people ended up watching on-screen. And the studio blamed for such below-par work was a Juhu-based one called Pen India Pvt Ltd. Surely, there was nothing wrong with the story - Mahabharat is one of the most popular epics in the world. And the voice-acting was top-notch. So the only factors behind the debacle were the quality of animation and marketing.
Is Outsourcing killing creativity ?
Yes it is killing the creativity. Like many other industries, animation in India earns most of its revenues through outsourced projects from American and European studios. According to a secondary research presented in the NASSCOM Industry Report, the money earned by Indian animation and VFX studios from global projects has steadily increased over the past decade.
While that is good news from a business standpoint, the increasing number of outsourced projects also means that the animators are constantly working under strict deadlines and their project work is always under remote supervision which hardly leaves any room for creative decision-making. For the global studios, the Indian animation talent is akin to a sweatshop where the designs and plans are already in place and the workers are only expected to execute them.
Such an environment not only tramples upon creativity but also leaves little time to pursue one's creative aspirations. The few animators who choose not to work for those studios often find it difficult to earn a decent living. This is because the domestic market for animation is quite small. In 2009, domestic projects only accounted for 30% of the total revenues the industry earned. The rest came from outsourced animation, gaming and VFX work.
Failure to woo the target audience
As animated movies are relatively new in India, one of the biggest mistakes happened in figuring out the right content for a particular demographic. If you were to look at some of the animated films that came from India and achieved very little success, you might end up thinking - here's a country where kids love Hindu mythology.
It might seem odd now but that's exactly what the producers had in mind when they released movies like Ramayan, Chhota Bheem, Ghatotkach, Krishna, etc. All of these feature stories from Hindu mythology and as India has the largest Hindu population, the producers just assumed that these stories would be popular. What a wrong assumption to make! What they don't realise is that these stories are already known to Indian kids and they are not getting anything new or original out of these films. However, the Indian film industry is partly to blame for this - originality has never been its strong point.
Animation film-makers of India need to learn from studios like Pixar, DreamWorks and Disney who come up with highly original scripts such as WALL-E, Kung-fu Panda, Madagascar, Toy Story, How to Train Your Dragon and more. On the other hand, the Indian audience must change their mindset and start enjoying good animated films. Discarding an animated movie as a 'cartoon' film is an indication that most Indian viewers still think that anything animated is meant 'for the kids.' If only our people grew up on Japanese Manga and Anime from a very early age...
Training Counts
Animation can be taught while sketching is a talent that is honed over a longer period of time. So, the first thing wannabe animators need to know is that you need to love art, drawing and sketching. In India, people often choose animation as a career just because it is a booming sector. Five years ago, they might have chosen biotechnology or marine engineering for the same reason. But that's not the way to go about choosing a career. There are a handful of really good schools in India for learning animation, illustration or design - such as the National Institute of Design (NID), Srishti School of Art and Design, J.J. Institute of Applied Art, Arena Multimedia, etc. Aspirants should target these schools instead of opting for short-term certificate courses that promise placement. Some of the best Indian animators studied in these well-known institutions. For instance, Vaibhav Kumaresh, a student of NID, is one of the most coveted names in Indian animation. He is the one who created Channel V's famous Sardar Simpoo Singh Sodhi and the Amaron Battery characters. Gitanjali Rao, an alumnus of J.J. Institute of Applied Art, won an award in Cannes in 2006 for her animated short, Printed Rainbow.
The future of animation in India can go either way. If we can come up with a few studios which will devote resources and talent for consistently creating really good content and art, the production will be on par with the industry leaders. A good marketing team can then sell it to the world. But without such initiatives, animation in India may just end up being a prop for creating logos for production houses and meeting deadlines for other studios who will get all the credit for creativity.
No comments:
Post a Comment